59 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
59 lines
2.2 KiB
TeX
|
% Article example, with a bibliography
|
||
|
% Uses BibLaTeX and Biber
|
||
|
|
||
|
\documentclass[11pt,a4paper]{article} % Article, A4 format , font size 11pt
|
||
|
\usepackage{lmodern} % Uses modern font (better rendering)
|
||
|
%\usepackage{polyglossia} % Package used for the language managment. Implies XeLaTeX
|
||
|
%\setdefaultlanguage{french} % Sets the default language
|
||
|
\usepackage[french]{babel} % Sets language with the babel package instead of polyglossia
|
||
|
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} % Declares the encoding type of the source file
|
||
|
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc} % Sets the encoding of the output file
|
||
|
\usepackage{hyperref} % URL and link management. Mandatory for Vancouver
|
||
|
\usepackage[citestyle=numeric,
|
||
|
style=vancouver,
|
||
|
backend=biber]{biblatex} % Loads the BibLaTeX package, with options
|
||
|
% \usepackage[citestyle=authoryear,
|
||
|
% style=apa,
|
||
|
% backend=biber]{biblatex} % Loads the BibLaTeX package, with options
|
||
|
% Declares the references file
|
||
|
\addbibresource{references-exercice.bib}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\author{Dimitri Donzé, Vincent Hubert, Igor Milhit}
|
||
|
\title{Notre pseudo-article}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{document}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\maketitle
|
||
|
|
||
|
\section{Introduction}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dans ce pseudo-travail, nous prétendons introduire notre sujet, comme la
|
||
|
littérature le conseille généralement \autocite{caiWhatMakesGood2021}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Une bonne introduction annonce aux lecteurs et lectrices un certain nombre
|
||
|
d'éléments indispensables au sujet de l'article qu'elles et ils vont lire,
|
||
|
comme le suggèrent Sauvayre, Bosma et Blom
|
||
|
\autocite*{sauvayreMethodesEntretienSciences2013,
|
||
|
bosmaCodeswitchingAsymmetryBilingual2019}.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\section{Première partie}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Dans \emph{cette première
|
||
|
partie}\autocite{slaweckiParadigmsQualitativeResearch2018}, nous pouvons afficher
|
||
|
la citation suivante.
|
||
|
|
||
|
\begin{quote}
|
||
|
The results showed that different reference managers require different
|
||
|
levels of effort, and users generally prefer the tools that involve less
|
||
|
effort. We also found that although reference managers share similar features,
|
||
|
differences in presentation and organization matter. We conclude this work by
|
||
|
providing a set of guidelines for both users and developers of reference
|
||
|
managers.\autocite{caiWhatMakesGood2021}
|
||
|
\end{quote}
|
||
|
|
||
|
\newpage
|
||
|
% Print the bibliography
|
||
|
\printbibliography
|
||
|
|
||
|
\end{document}
|